| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Suggestions to increase EVE player base. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP could do a better job with player retention with just a little more hand holding in the first few weeks of gameplay. Unfortunately most new subscribers have no idea what a sandbox game is or what to do in it since EVE is pretty much the only ...
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2012.06.14 21:49:00
|
2. In Defense of Luring the Themepark Crowd - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Snow Axe wrote: Harelip Jenkins wrote: You may be right. The problem may just be a deserved mistrust of CCP (well earned) from the whole microtransactions fiasco. It's much simpler than that - far more people don't want to PVP at all, le...
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2012.05.31 22:55:00
|
3. In Defense of Luring the Themepark Crowd - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Snow Axe wrote: Marlona Sky wrote: Whatever happened to the desire to turn theme park players into cold blooded killers?? We're in the midst of a big stupid brouhaha from a group of those very same players who, out of nowhere, have decide...
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2012.05.31 22:49:00
|
4. In Defense of Luring the Themepark Crowd - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James 315 wrote: Harelip Jenkins wrote: And, I know its a constant battle to keep CCP from actually turning Hi-sec into a themepark, but as long as that doesn't happen, the meta-game can help CCP pocket some nice development dollars, can add...
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2012.05.31 22:46:00
|
5. In Defense of Luring the Themepark Crowd - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marlona Sky wrote: Whatever happened to the desire to turn theme park players into cold blooded killers?? Exactly my point. Lure em in then corrupt em.
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2012.05.31 22:40:00
|
6. In Defense of Luring the Themepark Crowd - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Selinate wrote: FFS, the epic mission arcs, complexes, and incursions are about as close to theme parks as Eve needs. They at least provide *some* sense of immersion... I'm not suggesting changing EVE to a themepark style game. Just suggesti...
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2012.05.31 22:37:00
|
7. In Defense of Luring the Themepark Crowd - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Darth Tickles wrote: Ultimate failure of Eve is CCP's arrangements for transitioning people from themepark to sandbox. get that **** right and they'd have >1m subs easy. Instead they'll just keep chasing their tail adding new features and f...
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2012.05.31 22:31:00
|
8. In Defense of Luring the Themepark Crowd - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I see a lot of rants about how CCP shouldn't attempt to lure the themepark crowd into EVE. I think this is fairly shortsighted. Luring these people into the game could be very beneficial to EVE over the long term... as long as EVE stays EVE . My...
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2012.05.31 22:28:00
|
9. Why not respond to the new emergent gameplay? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vicky Somers wrote: The thing is... Every time a pve/indy corp gets aggressed through a war dec or whatever and they decide to fight back, the following happens. They get together with the whole bunch in frigates, cruisers, bcs and the odd bat...
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2012.05.30 02:28:00
|
10. Why not respond to the new emergent gameplay? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
...sigh... this makes me want to gank miners
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2012.05.30 02:11:00
|
11. Why not respond to the new emergent gameplay? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jame Jarl Retief wrote: Harelip Jenkins wrote: Just out of curiosity, why not an organized response to the new Goon sponsored "emergent gameplay"? There is going to be a sh*tpile of whine coming in response to the Goons indefinite extension...
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2012.05.30 02:02:00
|
12. Why not respond to the new emergent gameplay? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Just out of curiosity, why not an organized response to the new Goon sponsored "emergent gameplay"? There is going to be a sh*tpile of whine coming in response to the Goons indefinite extension of Hulkageddon. Why not take two or three months a...
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2012.05.30 01:56:00
|
13. Last thread about CSM was closed for not being constructive... Take 2 on the CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think making in-game voting (not compulsory) with an eve-mail alert (or something similar) would get more High-sec people involved. My guess is that most high-sec players don't spend a lot of time trolling the Eve-O forums.
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2011.12.06 04:04:00
|
14. Who knows what's important to the players? CSM or the players? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kunming Originally by: Khamelean Originally by: edith prickley ... If your against MT of any sort, why are still playing a game that has supported MT for years? Trying to cook the frog slowly eh? The...
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2011.07.13 16:37:00
|
15. Tally of resubs! X Here if you are satisfied and have resubbed! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
+3
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2011.07.03 23:55:00
|
16. An overdue apology and request for parley - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
:tinfoil hat: Honestly if think the new non-vanity items will be "contraband". I think that was the purpose of the Quafe Zero coming out of left field... to test player reaction. We were promised an update to contraband and i think were about t...
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2011.06.27 03:20:00
|
17. An overdue apology and request for parley - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The problem I see with P2W items is the slippery slope. Lets say that the new incoming crowd of players loves the idea of being able to purchase wtfpwn guns from the NEX. They buy said guns and what's left of the player base happily ganks said no...
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2011.06.27 03:12:00
|
18. Not Sure If Anybody Has Asked This Question Yet - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Will Aurum go further than just vanity items?
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2011.06.26 14:59:00
|
19. Perpetuum, how is it? - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
It'll be interesting to be on the ground floor of the next true sandbox MMO. It's rough around the edges but so was Eve. Maybe these guys can refrain from selling their product out to the lowest common denominator. The players built Eve. The pla...
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2011.06.26 02:17:00
|
20. oh great CCP actually can dig propaganda now lol - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
WTF?!
- by Harelip Jenkins - at 2011.06.26 00:01:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |